SF Gate: The Great Tom Cruise Backlash (Frothering Scientology Nutball)
http://www.sfgate.com/columnists/morford/
The Great Tom Cruise Backlash
Will this annoying phase pass, or will Tom become the next super-rich,
Mel Gibson-like nutball?
By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist
Let it begin now. Let it start with a wry askance glance and evolve into
full-fledged annoyance and then move into raging hell-bent OK that's
quite enough now please stop before we slap you silly.
Note to Tom Cruise: You are maxing out. Wearing out the welcome.
Becoming less the tolerable and moderately talented and mildly likable
megastar and more like an itchy boil on the deranged ferret of popular
culture, requiring lancing.
The signs are all in place. The crazy ranting, the jumping on couches,
the crazed grins, the enormous piles of money, the incessant photos of
you sucking the face off your new and bewildered and child-like fiancee,
the weird diatribes about psychiatry and mental health, the relatively
common knowledge that you are super-seriously involved at the highest
levels with one of the creepier money-hungry pseudo-religions in the
nation.
Also: the assigning of a "handler" from said cult to tag along
with your new bewildered young fiancee everywhere she goes to "keep
her on the path" and make sure she doesn't, I don't know what. Talk
about the nightmares? Break down in a heap and confess that it's all a
staged setup? Reveal your true lizard identity?
Yes, Tom Cruise is getting weirder, more annoying than ever. Or maybe he
was already deeply weird and we just didn't know it because he was
famously tight-lipped in interviews and was never much of a deep thinker
and wasn't all that articulate and no one really paid much attention
because, well, who really cares?
But now, oh, Tom is opening up. Tom is speaking extemporaneously on talk
shows and in interviews about life and love and Scientology, free of the
careful grooming and aggressive protection of his former publicist, and
while he's still not all that interesting, he is indeed letting his true
colors beam right through and those colors are sort of a strange reddish
brown with lots of unbecoming blue polka dots and weird slashes of hot
pink all overarched by a vague hint of a rainbow flag waving just
overhead.
There are rumors, and they are all juicy and fun. Rumors that Cruise
"interviewed" numerous young actresses to play the part of
his fiancee so as to crank the Scientology awareness quotient and
downplay the gay rumors. Rumors of Katie Holmes being essentially
trained by the "church" to forgo her former self. Rumors
that Holmes essentially vanished for 16 days just before emerging with
Cruise on her arm and a hundred million more dollars in her future and
a new, decidedly odd Scientology gleam/haze over her eyes.
Aren't rumors fun? Totally silly? But somehow, in the age of Bush and
bogus wars and massive, commonplace deceptions, weirdly believable?
Also: Rumors persist that Tom's Scientology-rich pseudo-love somehow
convinced Katie that she must immediately dump her longtime, beloved
manager and agent switch to his. And she is rumored to be disassociating
with old friends and not communicating with her close family (cult
behaviors, all) -- and did we mention the part about how the
Scientologists have allegedly assigned her a handler/new best friend to
tag along wherever she goes and answer questions for her and coach her
on how to behave and speak when asked about their "religion"?
Hell, not even Mel Gibson has a beady-eyed priest from the Holy Family
uber-Catholic sect following him around everywhere he goes, answering,
in hissing Latin, questions from Vanity Fair reporters and spraying
everyone with fake stage blood and sitting next to Mel in all the big
studio meetings and screaming "Jesus wants 20 percent off the back end,
plus international DVD rights!" while twitching madly.
But then again, Mel's an old hand at being a slightly creepy religious
nuthead. And now, apparently, so is Tom. After all, he's been deep into
Scientology for upward of 20 years, and is rumored to have progressed to
the level of an OT6 (Operating Thetan 6), which is a super-secret high
level of the church with super-secret knowledge of the alien story
(called "The incident") and ESP, and they all get super-secret
decoder rings with access to all the best alien-bred hallucinogens in the
L. Ron Hubbard Bone Room, where high ranking devotees gather to drink bunny
blood and watch old Travolta movies and discuss what the hell to do
about Kirstie Alley.
But Katie Holmes, she's not like them. She's just a kid. She needs lots
of creepy brainwashi... er, gentle religious coaching into the
super-secret ways of the "church" of Scientology, with their
incredibly vicious army of lawyers who attack anyone who says anything
at all negative about their cult... er, religion.
(Note to Scientology: first signs that you are not a true religion: You
cannot take a joke. You have an army of attack lawyers. You are so
unstable as a religion you are unable to handle satire. You think the
Kabballah is suing everyone who trashes Madonna? They'd be broke in a
week. Just a thought.)
One thing the weird TomKat relationship is not, we can be reasonably
sure, is a publicity stunt designed to lure more fans to "War of the
Worlds" and "Batman Begins." Reason: Tom Cruise does not
need the money. As Edward Jay Epstein points out in his excellent Slate
piece, Tommy raked in well over $120 million on the first two
"Mission: Impossible" movies alone, and stands to make easily
that much from "War of the Worlds" and the forthcoming
"M:I-3" and he is quickly accumulating more power and money
than God or than the giddy accountants over at the bizarre Scientology
compound outside Hemet, Calif., ever wet-dreamed.
Should we be worried? Should anyone care? Should it at all matter beyond
buying yourself a Free Katie T-shirt and shaking your head and laughing
it all off as just more pop culture chyme and then going to rent the
surprisingly decent "Minority Report"? Of course it doesn't.
Getting deeply involved in the lives of annoying, semi-articulate celebs
is like getting all wrapped up in what Paris Hilton feeds her Chihuahua.
It just has no bearing.
But then again, we have a warning. Remember, won't you, the savage
impact Mel Gibson had, coming out of the blue and slapping the culture
with his ultraviolent, blood-drenched vision of a very miserable Jesus
being pulverized into raw veal and calling it spiritual enlightenment.
Kooky-rich celebs with pseudo-religious agendas can be dangerous indeed,
if for no other reason than they annoy the living hell out of you when
you're trying to meditate.
It just feels like Tom is gearing up for something, doesn't it? Like
it's no more Tom Cruise the cute kid from "Risky Business" or
the hot gay stud from "Top Gun" or the chick-flick dreamboat
from "Jerry McGuire," but now it will be Tom Cruise, the
bizarre Hollywood power player, the unstoppable, outspoken cult-head
with a gleaming, glazed-eyed "wife," proselytizing like a
ferret and working hard to convert the masses.
It feels like this is all some sort of bizarre precursor to, say, 2015,
when Cruise's powerful production company suddenly whips out "The
Passion of the Hubbard," depicting the cheesy sci-fi hack writer and
Scientology founder as the new Jesus, dancing with 75-million-year-old
aliens and battling the evil overlord Xenu while busting "engrams"
like water balloons and calling on the people of Earth to join him in the
bunker so we may all join hands and look to the skies for the next big
comet to pass by so we may leap from this Earthly plane and join the
UFOs on their journey and . . . oh wait, sorry, wrong sect.
So anyway. Thanks, Tom, for all the decent movies, aggro performances,
that mega-intense, frat-boy-on-'roids stare. But please, before you get
any weirder, would you maybe consider exiting calmly? Is it too late to
ask? If we all buy a copy of Hubbard's silly little "Dianetics"
and send it to Brooke Shields, will you go away and leave us alone? Damn.
I didn't think so.
The name "Scientology"® is trademarked to the "Church" of Scientology. Neither this web page, nor this web site, nor any of the individuals mentioned herein assisting to educate the public about the Scientology organization's "Volunteer Minister" program are members of or representatives of the Scientology organization. Quotes used within this web page and within this web site are used according to the Fair Use laws of the United States.
If you find anything inaccurate or otherwise mistaken on this web page, please send a correction to Fredric L. Rice at the e-mail address offered below -- with our thanks.
E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank